Monday, 29 October 2018

Scream 4


2011’s Scream 4, directed by Wes Craven.

Starring Neve Campbell, Courtney Cox, David Arquette, Emma Roberts, Hayden Panettiere, Aimee Teegarden, Marley Shelton, Rory Culkin, Alison Brie, Adam Brody, Anthony Anderson, and Mary McDonnell.

What is it about?

Set back in the town of Woodsboro, California, it’s been a decade and a half since the events depicted in Scream. Promoting her new autobiographical book about her survival, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) arrives in town to find a new generation of high school kids influenced by both her experiences and the movies made based off of her story, the Stab franchise. Young cousin Jill (Emma Roberts), and best friend Kirby (Hayden Panettiere) do their best to avoid being victims to another version of the ghostface. They’ll have the help of promoted to Deputy, Dewey Riley (David Arquette) and his assistant Judy (Marley Shelton), along with his wife, writer Gail Weathers-Dewey (Courtney Cox). Will they be able to stop the pop culture inspired psychopath, or end up being ineligible for future sequels?

Why is it worth seeing?

Director Wes Craven returns in the fourth entry of the slasher pastiche franchise. The trusty trio of Neve Campbell’s heroine Sidney Prescott, David Arquette’s humble Dewey Riley, and Courtney Cox’s investigative Gail Weathers, are joined by a new generation of teenagers, in the sequel that no one asked for.
Writer Kevin Williamson photocopies his previous works, that of the self referential and too hip for thou vibes, and introduces a new generation to celebrate the irony of mocking irony. Featuring tropes such as live web casting murders, cheering the nihilism of how there are no rules anymore, and craving social media exposure over life itself- one is thankful we’ve made it this far in the franchise at all.  
After 4 movies, it’s tough to say where we’ve gone after all of this carnage - Campbell’s heroine has little to do but get angry at yet another killer messing with her mojo, and Cox’s journalist gladly tosses her half hearted attempt to become a writer and instead (again) plays detective with her husband- although Arquette is weightier in stature after 3 previous movies of being a schmuck. But with the veterans of the cast feeling past their primes, the kids forget to show up to take their places. As always, the kids bring their attitude, their entitlement, and their pop culture encyclopedias- but it gets harder and harder not to empathize with the killer, as the increasing body count means the credits come rolling faster.
Scream 4 exists in a strange place. Unlike Scream 2, it’s competently made, and it could be even more entertaining than Scream 3 (it definitely doesn’t have the heart), as it pounds away to it’s cynical conclusion. But it’s most salient fact seems to be that it was conceived as the opener to a trilogy that never happened. With the studio unhappy with making a measly $100 million on its $40 million budget, there would be more no further sequels, and none of them really topped the original (itself a good film but hardly a seminal classic).


Wes Craven was a horror pioneer, so it makes it all the more galling that this was his last movie before his death. Perhaps he meant it as 1 last (cough), stab towards the Hollywood establishment, that of its never ending sequels and lazy money grabs. But the Scream franchise’s biggest legacy might be the lack of impression it made on the genre. It was mocked itself by the hugely successful (and dreadful) Scary Movie franchise, but seemed to influence little of the horror genre, being eclipsed instead by so-called torture porn and found footage sub genres. Some people will do anything to leave their mark.


Rating:

3/5



No comments:

Post a Comment